Monday, November 10, 2014
The Last Trumpet
I have just released my first piece of new writing since I retired on disability several years ago. It is called "The Last Trumpet" and its purpose is to serve as a refutation of the pre-tribulation rapture theory. It costs 99 cents at Amazon.com, only existing in digital format, but if you can't afford the price or don't have access to a Kindle reader, I'll send you a copy for free. Just send me a note.
I am also at work on another similar project that I'm tentatively calling "Disease and Faith" that is kind of a summation of the things I've learned from my experiences with Parkinson's Disease, Crohn's Disease, and different expressions of faith. If my past writing speed is any indication, look for it around the year 3000.
In the meantime, I hope to do a little better with these blog posts, particularly the Significant Passages and Acts of Worship ideas, and I may be getting into some musical posts as well, just having been blessed by the recovery of some songs that I wrote half a lifetime ago. And finally, I hope to sometime finish "Owan's Regret," which is likely the final installment in my Hagenspan Chronicles series. Thanks for the encouragement to keep on writing. You know who you are, Harold!
Labels:
books,
eschatology,
faith,
parables,
rapture
Friday, July 25, 2014
Dear John
Yesterday my son John sent me a note on Facebook, asking me
to present him with some scriptures describing the character of God. I was honored and humbled by the request—honored
that he would think I'd know, and humbled because I fall so very far short of
such wisdom. Knowing God is the diligent
pursuit of a lifetime, and here I am collecting baseball jerseys. Nevertheless, I will try to provide an
answer, because my heavenly Father would want me to. Understand that these thoughts are just the
jumping-off point, not the very depths.
God is holy.
"I saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lifted
up, and the train of His robe filled the temple. Above it stood seraphim; each one had six
wings: with two he covered his face, with two he covered his feet, and with two
he flew. And one cried to another and
said: 'Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of His
glory!'" (Isaiah 6:1b-3 NKJV). The
scene in Heaven shows the angels constantly singing out to each other,
"God is holy!" This warrants
much thought; the holiness of God has been largely forgotten by this generation
in this land, which has found it much more comfortable to believe that God is
love, while ignoring the majesty of His holiness. With that said …
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Intro to Acts of Worship
For years I have been troubled by the contemporary American
Christian view of what "praise" is and what "worship"
is. This is grossly oversimplifying the
problem, but I trust you will understand: "Praise" is when the music
is fast and "worship" is when the music is slow. The first is hand-clappy; the second is
hand-raisey. "Praise" makes
you feel excited and glad to be a Christian, whereas "worship" fills
you with gooey emotions as you imagine yourself being in the very presence of
God. I meekly submit the possibility
that we are being manipulated by musicians in our quest to find and do true worship.
(Full disclosure: I spent more than a decade of my younger
years as a piano player and worship leader for several charismatic/pentecostal congregations,
trying like crazy to produce exactly the same effects as those which I have
just described. So my discomfort may
very well be tied to my intimacy with the issue. What honest cigarette-smoker wants to be
around someone who has just quit? The
evangelistic fervor of the new non-smoker is a disagreeable pain in the
backside for those who have no thought of cessation. Maybe it's the same with me; I grant the
possibility.)
But what happens when you don't like the style of music
played at your church? Someone very dear
to me dislikes modern worship choruses and loves the old hymns. That person has said to me, "I just
can't worship with that music." My
children (at least when they were young) loved modern worship music and despised
hymns, thinking any hymn-singing crowd to be the hallmark of dead religion. I find myself falling in the middle; I like
some of the new songs, but hate the lazy song-writing most of the new lyrics exhibit. Some of them seem like random slap-togethers
of religious-sounding phrases. And some
of the old hymns bore me, and some of them are a little questionable theologically
too. I find myself feeling a lot more
"worshipful" when there's a song being played that I like, and the
drummer executes a particularly clever and innovative fill (the drummer at our
church is very talented). I instantly
realize that my emotions are being manipulated by the music … but I didn't
recognize that when I was younger.
As far as "being in the very presence of God" is
concerned, though … whenever were you not
in the presence of God? It is a staple
of the Christian faith to believe that God is omnipresent; He is everywhere. Though He may choose not let you sense His presence, there is no place
where He is not. "In Him we live,
and move, and have our being" (Acts 17:28 NKJV). Where do we live? In Him. If our very existence is in Him, where can we
be that He is not? Our problem is our perception; our problem is
that we don't recognize Him.
Romans 12:1 says this: "I beseech you therefore,
brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice,
holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service" (NKJV). Normally I dislike using multiple translations
in order to cherry-pick the one that best supports the point I'm trying to
make, but the fact is that the "reasonable service" mentioned in this
verse does bear looking at in other versions.
The ASV presents it as "spiritual service"; the CEB as
"appropriate priestly service"; the ESV as "spiritual
worship." The Amplified, which is
useful for wringing every possible nuance out of the scriptures, presents
Romans 12:1 as this: "I appeal to you therefore, brethren, and beg of you in view of [all] the
mercies of God, to make a decisive dedication of your bodies [presenting all
your members and faculties] as a living sacrifice, holy (devoted, consecrated)
and well pleasing to God, which is your reasonable (rational, intelligent)
service and spiritual worship."
Here we get to the heart of the matter: Our "spiritual
worship" of God has little to do with our feelings. It has much to do with our actions.
There may be emotions that are stirred by the recognition of what God
has done for us—indeed, one would be astonished if there were not—but the act
of worship is a living, obedient, sacrificial thing that we do, not that we feel. I stumble a bit at my own characterization
that it is a living thing that we do,
for in a sense it is also a dying
thing that we do. It involves a death
to selfish pleasures in order that someone else may live, in clear-eyed recognition
of who God is, and what He has done for us.
It involves a death to our reputations and our fortunes and our comforts
in order that someone else may live, in clear-eyed recognition of who God is,
and what He has done for us. And it is
in this dying that we find ourselves more completely alive at a different
level.
In the coming posts, I will offer three or four examples of
what I call Acts of Worship. Please feel
free to debate or offer suggestions or examples of your own.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Bends in the Road
I’d like to introduce you to some fine boys—four of them, in fact: Hananiah, Mishael, Azariah, and Daniel. These boys were good-looking and smart, but they weren’t vain about it; they also honored and served God faithfully. They were the golden boys, they were the Rat Pack of their time and place, with Daniel playing Sinatra, and the other three assuming their proper lesser roles. Their potential was unlimited, their future bright. It would be tempting to believe that these good times would never end, that if they just followed the road they were on, it would lead them to a lifetime of prosperity, honor, and respect. It would be tempting to trust in the natural gifts the Lord had bestowed upon them, their good looks, their charm, their intelligence.
But
then: a bend in the road.
It
wasn't their fault, they had done nothing to deserve it, but suddenly the road
they were traveling took an unexpected and unavoidable 90-degree turn to the
left. Jerusalem was besieged, overrun,
and conquered by Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon. The boys were given over
as prisoners, spoils of war, slaves to this terrible foreign king. They would never see their beloved homeland
again in their lifetime. They were
probably made eunuchs, which meant they would never have families of their
own. It would be tempting to despair, to
doubt God, to doubt their position as God's chosen people.
And
then: a bend in the road.
Labels:
faith,
perseverance,
sermons,
suffering,
temptation
Monday, March 10, 2014
Significant Passages #2: John 6:28-29
Another one of my favorite passages of scripture—one that I discovered relatively late in my life—is John 6:28-29. When I say "discovered," I really mean "was uncovered for me by the Holy Spirit," because I had certainly read that passage several times previously, without it having made the least impression on me. Here it is:
Then they said to Him, "What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?" Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent."Let me set the stage for you. Earlier in John chapter six, Jesus had fed five thousand men (and their families, presumably) with five loaves of barley bread, and two small fish—a notable miracle. Later that same evening, He had walked upon the sea—another notable miracle. The next day, those who had been miraculously fed sought Him. When they found Him, they asked, "What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?"
It's not totally clear to me exactly what they were asking. Were they saying, "What can we do, so that we can work miracles like You do?" It seems to be a faint possibility—that they thought that Jesus was just a man like them, and the "works of God" were something to which they could aspire. But it seems much more likely to me that they were asking Him how they could satisfactorily obey the Law—a noble question, worthy to be asked: "What works can we do that will make us pleasing and acceptable to God?" (The famous Bible commentator Matthew Henry says that they were asking what works they could do to make them worthy to receive "the food which endures to everlasting life," which Jesus had just told them about (John 6:27 NKJV); this is of essentially the same substance as my conjecture.)
Jesus' answer is the answer to any and all who have tried to satisfy the holiness of God by a strenuous obedience to His Law. "This is the work of God," He says. "This is what you must do to satisfy the requirements of God Almighty: believe." Not tithe; not give to the poor; not be patient with your wife or be a good father—believe. Now, we understand that anyone who truly does believe in Jesus will want to tithe and give to the poor and be patient and everything else that he thinks will please the Father; but that's not where his salvation lies. His salvation lies in his faith—in his belief in the Gospel, that Jesus died on the cross for his sins (1 Corinthians 15:3-4) and was raised for our justification (Romans 4:25). Believe the Gospel—not trust in your own works. Believe in Jesus—not believe in yourself.
There is another sense that can be given to the words, "This is the work of God," with which I once again find agreement with Matthew Henry: "This is the work that God must do; this is the work which Man cannot do."
The work of faith is the work of God. They enquire after the works of God (in the plural number), being careful about many things; but Christ directs them to one work, which includes all, the one thing needful: that you believe, which supersedes all the works of the ceremonial law; the work which is necessary to the acceptance of all the other works, and which produces them, for without faith you cannot please God. It is God's work, for it is of his working in us, it subjects the soul to his working on us, and quickens the soul in working for him (Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible).I'm not sure which of the petals of Calvinism's tulip this would fall under: unconditional election or irresistible grace, but it informs us regarding both. We do not work to obtain salvation; it is God Who provides. And when God creates in us the faith of His working, we do believe indeed. In any case, the glory belongs to Him.
Friday, February 28, 2014
Significant Passages #1: Luke 22:31-32
Upon the startling discovery that I actually have a reader,
I pledge to post a little more consistently.
You can expect posts about once a week, on Friday or Saturday. At least that's the plan!
Here we go.
Sometimes a Bible verse or passage seems to practically leap
off the page and attach itself to my brain (or my heart, maybe; I can't decide which). In the old days, they may have said something
to the effect of one's "bowels being moved with compassion," but in
our times, "bowel movement" has come to mean something entirely different. In today's culture, what used to be
represented by the bowels has come to be referred to as the heart, but that's a
little too weak and emotional for my meaning, whereas the brain has come to
mean (in many church circles) something cold and clinical, lacking
passion. What I mean is something
between the heart and the brain, taking the best parts of both and maintaining
a balance that is proper and good. At
least that's what I think I mean. All of
that to say this: Sometimes a Bible verse or passage becomes important to me, in a way that nails
together my theology, and—more importantly—anchors my faith more upon God and
His Word.
This is such a passage.
And the Lord said, "Simon,
Simon! Indeed, Satan has asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat. But I have prayed for you, that your faith
should not fail; and when you have returned to Me, strengthen your brethren"
(Luke 22:31-32 NKJV).
The setting is this: Jesus is in the upper room with His
disciples, having just finished the Passover meal. He has just instituted the Lord's Supper,
which we now know as the Eucharist or Holy Communion. Some of the disciples are now arguing over
who's going to be the greatest. Then the
Lord drops this bombshell on Simon Peter: "Satan has asked for you, that
he may sift you as wheat." Then
Peter says, all bluster and wind, "Lord, I am ready to go with You, both
to prison and to death," to which Jesus replies His famous words, "I
tell you, Peter, the rooster shall not crow this day before you will deny three
times that you know Me."
There are two things I take away from this passage that are
very precious to me: First of all, that Satan has to ask permission before he
can do anything to one of God's chosen.
It's like the throne room scene in the book of Job all over again. Satan can accuse, but he can't touch—not without
God's permission. There is no attack or
temptation that can touch us without the direct knowledge and consent of our
Father in Heaven.
Secondly, regarding what is sometimes called "the perseverance
of the saints," Jesus tells Simon Peter, "I have prayed for you, that
your faith should not fail; and when you have returned to Me, strengthen your
brethren." Notice that Jesus does
not say "if you return to
me"—He says "when you
return to Me." There isn't any
"if!" The prayer of Jesus does
not return to Him unanswered. If Jesus
prays for you, you're in a good place.
Therefore He is also able to save
to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to
make intercession for them (Hebrews 7:25 NKJV).
Apparently, Jesus continues to pray for His chosen ones—He always
lives to make intercession for them.
Hopefully, that number includes you and me, who have put our trust in
Him, who have come to God through Him … and He is able to save us to the
uttermost.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Thanksgiving Day 2012
(Yes, 2012. I wrote this last year on Thanksgiving morning.)
The least of Your kindnesses would have proved to me that You are good,
for the least of Your kindnesses is more than my merits should have earned.
But You have given me multitudes of kindnesses, kindness upon kindness,
to me, the enemy of You.
And not only this, but once upon a time You clothed Yourself with flesh,
came down to see me, Your enemy, and took pity upon this poor man.
Suffered the shame that had been decreed for me, took my works as Your own,
and gave Your works to me.
This is the greatest kindness that could ever be; it was enough and more.
Yet still You shower me with multitudes of kindnesses, kindness upon kindness,
to me, once the enemy of You.
How shall I not be thankful?
The least of Your kindnesses would have proved to me that You are good,
for the least of Your kindnesses is more than my merits should have earned.
But You have given me multitudes of kindnesses, kindness upon kindness,
to me, the enemy of You.
And not only this, but once upon a time You clothed Yourself with flesh,
came down to see me, Your enemy, and took pity upon this poor man.
Suffered the shame that had been decreed for me, took my works as Your own,
and gave Your works to me.
This is the greatest kindness that could ever be; it was enough and more.
Yet still You shower me with multitudes of kindnesses, kindness upon kindness,
to me, once the enemy of You.
How shall I not be thankful?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

